‘Credibility’ vs. ‘Likelihood’ in OT Security
New Perspectives on High Consequence Security
If we implement the highest 62443 SL4 throughout, have we addressed all credible threats? Do we need strong protections against all credible threats with serious consequences? These are important questions as our OT threat environment continues to deteriorate.
But if “risk = consequence x likelihood,” can we even ask these questions with the word “likelihood”?
In this webinar Andrew Ginter takes us through:
The argument that we need our high-consequence risk and security guidance to stop talking about “likelihood” and start talking about either “frequency” or “credibility,” depending on context.
The cutting-edge debate that is likely to change forever how we think about high-consequence threats
About the Speaker
Andrew Ginter
Andrew Ginter is the most widely-read author in the industrial security space, with over 23,000 copies of his three books in print. He is a trusted advisor to the world's most secure industrial enterprises, and contributes regularly to industrial cybersecurity standards and guidance.
Share
Trending posts
Data Diodes vs. Unidirectional Gateways
April 14, 2025
Building a Game Plan for OT Remote Access
March 17, 2025
Stay up to date
Subscribe to our blog and receive insights straight to your inbox