‘Credibility’ vs. ‘Likelihood’ in OT Security
New Perspectives on High Consequence Security
Watch now on-demand
If we implement the highest 62443 SL4 throughout, have we addressed all credible threats? Do we need strong protections against all credible threats with serious consequences? These are important questions as our OT threat environment continues to deteriorate.
But if “risk = consequence x likelihood,” can we even ask these questions with the word “likelihood”?
In this webinar Andrew Ginter takes us through:
The argument that we need our high-consequence risk and security guidance to stop talking about “likelihood” and start talking about either “frequency” or “credibility,” depending on context.
The cutting-edge debate that is likely to change forever how we think about high-consequence threats
About the Speaker
Andrew Ginter
Andrew Ginter is the most widely-read author in the industrial security space, with over 35,000 copies of his three books in print. He is a trusted advisor to the world's most secure industrial enterprises, and contributes regularly to industrial cybersecurity standards and guidance.
Share
Watch Now
Trending posts
New Attack Visualizations, AI Attack Insights & Threat Data
October 4, 2026
Is Your OT Actually Isolated?
A 5-Minute Self-Assessment
September 23, 2026
Offshore Norge 104: Network Engineering for OT Cybersecurity
September 16, 2026
Stay up to date
Subscribe to our blog and receive insights straight to your inbox
